Former Texas governor Rick Perry was quoted on Tuesday saying that “We need to have a base-load. And the only way you can get a base-load in this country is [with] natural gas, coal, and nuclear.” A similar argument recently appeared in oilprice.com where the “base-load” provided by nuclear fuel was identified as an essential part of any power grid.
Citing the necessity of maintaining a base-load is the new defense of carbon and nuclear energy ever since these energy sources became considerably more expensive than renewable energy.
The concept of a utility base-load comes from the 20th-Century when coal was the least expensive form of energy (this statement ignores the environmental damage caused by the extraction, transportation, refinement and consumption of carbon). The base-load concept also comes from the technical nature of coal. A coal-fired plant cannot be turned up and down in response to changes in power demand. Either the plant is online or offline with the largest plants taking up to 3-days to come back online. As such, coal is always “on” providing the majority of power. During times of peak demand, gas-fired “peaker-plants” can quickly come online to satisfy short term power needs.
The above scenario revolves around the concepts of “transportable energy” and “local generation.” When the US grid was built, the only high voltage transportation technology available was High Voltage Alternating Current (HVAC). The problem with HVAC is that it is very inefficient when moving power over long distances. As such, the focus was on raw energy that could be easily transported for local generation and distribution. You can still drive around many working-class suburbs of Chicago and spend what seems like an eternity waiting for the coal train to pass.
The above energy distribution concept is over a half-century out of date. In the 1960s, the publicly owned Los Angels Department of Water and Power built the nation’s first High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) intertie that to this day brings power 940-miles south from the John Day Dam on the Columbia River to the county of Los Angeles. Ever since, LA County has been importing over 50% of its power from out-of-state hydro. During California’s rolling blackouts of 2001, Los Angeles County never lost power. China has built multiple thousands of miles of HVDC to connect hydro resources in the west to population centers in the east.
HVDC allows high voltage power to be transported over long distances with virtually no loss as compared with double digit losses that result from transporting power using HVAC. This means that portability of carbon and nuclear fuel is no longer an advantage. It no longer matters where the power is generated as it can be transported efficiently to where it is needed using HVDC.
Being able to move electricity without concern of where it is generated allows for a grid that no longer focuses on a base-load and can now focus on “balancing” power. This is a fundamental game-changer for the utility power industry as it all but eliminates the need for carbon and nuclear power. Now, all of our nation’s renewable energy can be integrated into a national grid using HVDC.
Balancing the grid means drawing on solar from the southwest deserts, wind from the central plains and hydro from the northeast. During the time between now and when there is sufficient utility scale storage, existing gas fired peaker-plants can be used if there is insufficient hydro and wind during the evening hours.
The next time you hear someone saying that we need carbon and nuclear power for a base-load, push back and explain how, with HVDC, the entire concept of base-load is archaic. What we need is a national HVDC grid that combines all of our nation’s abundant sources of renewable energy.